<div dir="ltr">Please see<div><a href="http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/2018-March/003342.html">http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/2018-March/003342.html</a> </div><div><a href="http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/2018-March/003343.html">http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/2018-March/003343.html</a></div><div><a href="http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/2018-March/003344.html">http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/2018-March/003344.html</a></div><div><a href="http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/2018-March/003349.html">http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/2018-March/003349.html</a> <br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 5:41 PM Pamela Chestek <<a href="mailto:pamela.chestek@opensource.org">pamela.chestek@opensource.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div>It was brought to my attention that the
ESA Public Licenses, as submitted here:
<a href="http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/2018-March/003337.html" target="_blank">http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/2018-March/003337.html</a>,
were never acted upon by the OSI. I extend the OSI's apologies for
the lapse.<br>
<br>
I have reviewed the threads and have a few questions about the
licenses. There are separate threads for the three licenses and
I'll raise my questions there.<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
<br>
Pamela Chestek<br>
Open Source Initiative<br>
Chair, Licensing Committee<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On 3/12/18 9:56 PM, Bruce Perens wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>Hi Carsten,<br>
<br>
</div>
I've reviewed the ESA licenses about 10 days ago. Patrice
also had a question. You haven't engaged either of us. It
seems to me that most of the issues I saw worked to ESA's
disadvantage rather than everyone else's. For example, 7.1
and 7.2 essentially negate themseves except for the rare
case that there is already a court ruling determining
infringement, and ESA says "You should acquire the
respective rights or modify the Software so that the
Modification is non-infringing" which in my country really
only should come from one's own lawyer.<br>
<br>
</div>
Do you wish to respond to any of the comments, or should we
make recommendations on the basis of the license text as it
stands?<br>
<br>
</div>
Thanks<br>
<br>
</div>
Bruce Perens<br>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<pre>_______________________________________________
License-review mailing list
<a href="mailto:License-review@lists.opensource.org" target="_blank">License-review@lists.opensource.org</a>
<a href="http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org" target="_blank">http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
License-review mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:License-review@lists.opensource.org" target="_blank">License-review@lists.opensource.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org</a><br>
</blockquote></div>