[License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4)
van.lindberg at gmail.com
Fri Dec 27 14:52:40 UTC 2019
Specifically, it is in the user data provision. The definition of user data
only includes data in which the recipient has an existing right of
ownership or possession.
The GDPR and CCPA include a provision that says that the data that must be
provided under those laws includes the data pertaining to that user, but
not to any other user.
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019, 7:59 AM Pamela Chestek <pamela at chesteklegal.com>
> On 12/26/2019 6:04 PM, VanL wrote:
> > There is no conflict with privacy laws - in fact, the CAL was written
> > so that compliance with the strongest extant privacy laws would also
> > satisfy the user data requirements of the CAL - and also, so that it
> > did not require giving any information that would be prohibited by
> > current privacy laws.
> Can you elaborate on where in the license this potential conflict is
> Pamela S. Chestek
> Chestek Legal
> PO Box 2492
> Raleigh, NC 27602
> pamela at chesteklegal.com
> License-review mailing list
> License-review at lists.opensource.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the License-review