[License-review] For Approval: Eclipse Public LIcense version 2.0

[patrick.moreau at tilc.fr]

I do not understand where is used the Modified Works in the license
text. 

Patrick Moreau
patrick.moreau at tilc.fr

Le 15.06.2017 22:38, Mike Milinkovich a écrit :

> On 2017-06-15 4:28 PM, Gervase Markham wrote: 
> 
> On 15/06/17 20:50, Mike Milinkovich wrote:
> 
> I look forward to all comments and feedback from this list.
> 
> "Contributor" means any person or entity that Distributes the Program.
> 
> This seems like an odd definition of "Contributor". Would it not make
> sense to call such a person a "Distributor"? I think people reading the
> license will assume a Contributor is someone who actually contributed to
> the project.

That definition is the same as in EPL version 1.0. We did look at doing
exactly what you described, but we determined in the end that the
surgery would too extensive.

> Nit: full-stop-comma in line 4 of defn. of "Modified Works".

Nothing is a nit at this stage. Thank you for the catch.

-- 
Mike Milinkovich
mike.milinkovich at eclipse-foundation.org
(m) +1.613.220.3223
Please note the change to my email address.

_______________________________________________
License-review mailing list
License-review at opensource.org
https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-review
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20170616/5aab5348/attachment.html>