[License-review] License Committee Report - for board meeting of 2013-11-06 [NASA, EUPL, and Tidepool]

[Luis Villa]

Reminder: if you have comments on NASA or EUPL (Tidepool still has its own
semi-active thread) now is the time for them :)


On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Luis Villa <luis at tieguy.org> wrote:

> This email is my report for licenses currently submitted to the OSI.
> If anybody disagrees with my assessment of the list's comments or
> conclusions, please change the subject line to be specific to the
> license you want to discuss, and comment before the meeting of Nov. 6.
>
> NASA OSL 2.0
> ===========
>
> Submission:
> http://projects.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review/2013-June/000610.html
>
> Comments: There have been some questions about the clarity of the
> license, particularly the use of "requests" in a section that NASA
> informs us is optional, and suggestions have been made to resolve
> those concerns. However, it appears that no substantive concerns about
> OSD-compliance have been raised.
>
> Recommendation: Board to approve.
>
> Tidepool Open Access to Health Data Software License
> ========================================
>
> Submission:
> http://projects.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review/2013-October/000646.html
>
> Comments: Discussion is ongoing and active.
>
> Recommendation: No recommendation at this time.
>
> EUPL 1.2
> =======
>
> Submission:
> http://projects.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review/2013-March/000540.html
>
> Comments: John Cowan reviewed the changes to the (earlier-approved)
> versions of the EUPL, and found nothing objectionable. No further
> objections have been raised, but we have been asked not to approve
> until the license is finalized.
>
> Recommendation: Board to approve when license is finalized.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20131030/7670eec7/attachment.html>