For (Legacy?) Approval: The MirOS Licence

[Matthew Flaschen]

Thorsten Glaser wrote:

>   ‣ use the term “work” instead of “software”
>     … which has the interesting side-effect that the MirOS Licence also
>       conforms to the Open Knowledge Definition (at least I think)

This is the only advantage I see over the MIT license, and in my opinion 
it's not nearly significant enough to justify approval.

> • allow for advertising clauses in a standardised manner

I don't see where the submission allows for advertising clauses.

Matt Flaschen