[License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD?

Bruce Perens bruce at perens.com
Tue Sep 20 03:49:07 UTC 2022


My interpretation is that OSD #3, in the words after the comma, does permit
immutable terms. Attribution is usually a statement of copyright ownership
and qualifies as a term. Rants do not.


On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 8:44 PM Thorsten Glaser <tg at mirbsd.de> wrote:

> Pamela Chestek dixit:
>
> > What about "this permission notice shall be included in all copies or
> > substantial portions of the Software"?
>
> That’s the licence text itself.
>
> > What about "If the Work includes
> > a 'NOTICE' text file as part of its distribution, then any Derivative
> > Works that You distribute must include a readable copy of the
> > attribution notices contained within such NOTICE file ..." Don't those
> > prohibit removal of the license text and any NOTICE file? The first is
> > MIT and the second is Apache, both unequivocally open source licenses.
>
> I don’t consider the Apache 2.0 licence OSS for this reason, and
> possibly others. This is worse than advertising clauses, in practice.
>
> (And advertising clauses are already bad enough, but at least very
> limited in scope, and avoidable in excerpts, if not full forks.)
>
> I guess it got approval by legacy rules (just like the AGPL, which
> is severely stretching things, and perhaps even the GPL).
>
> bye,
> //mirabilos
> --
> I believe no one can invent an algorithm. One just happens to hit upon it
> when God enlightens him. Or only God invents algorithms, we merely copy
> them.
> If you don't believe in God, just consider God as Nature if you won't deny
> existence.              -- Coywolf Qi Hunt
>
> _______________________________________________
> The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not
> necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the
> Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.
>
> License-discuss mailing list
> License-discuss at lists.opensource.org
>
> http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
>


-- 
Bruce Perens K6BP
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20220919/e51842d5/attachment.html>


More information about the License-discuss mailing list