[License-discuss] "Fairness" vs. mission objectives
cowan at ccil.org
Tue Feb 25 15:11:39 UTC 2020
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 7:15 AM Eric S. Raymond <esr at thyrsus.com> wrote:
> John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org>:
> > 3) We do not consider ourselves bound by stare decisis if we believe it
> > will lead to a bad result in this particular case. In my view,
> > license certification is not a situation in which it is always better to
> > have a settled result than a just result.
> That is elegantly put, and I fully concur.
Yes, well, growing up in a lawin' family ... (see below)
For the avoidance of doubt, though: "stare decisis" means "decide this
case like the last case", not "keep specific past decisions in effect". I
am saying that the former does not apply: we can and do change our rules to
maintain our goals. The latter is a different matter: I favor it except in
very unusual circumstances.
John Cowan http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org
The first thing you learn in a lawin' family is that there ain't
no definite answers to anything. --Calpurnia in To Kill A Mockingbird
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the License-discuss