[License-discuss] Certifying MIT-0

Pamela Chestek pamela at chesteklegal.com
Fri Apr 24 12:57:44 UTC 2020

On 4/22/2020 10:02 PM, Ryan Birmingham wrote:
> If I'm not mistaken, MIT-0 would probably not be recommended for the
> same reasons that the unlicense is not.
> --Ryan
The Unlicense has been submitted to License-Review and the review is
pending. If you have objections to it, then you should raise them there.
No one has mentioned any way in which it doesn't meet the OSD.


Pamela S. Chestek
Chestek Legal
PO Box 2492
Raleigh, NC 27602
pamela at chesteklegal.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20200424/1a56959d/attachment.html>

More information about the License-discuss mailing list