[License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1

[Lawrence Rosen]

Cem Karan wrote:

> The Federal Register process may be the best way forwards.  I'll bring it up in the next Federal Source Code policy meeting.

 

That may be a good solution. The Federal Register process requires public notice; public hearings; public feedback; written proposals based on legal reasoning; etc. It is not an in-house in-government discussion. :-)

 

/Larry

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20170227/f57a2881/attachment.html>