a.chiarelli at manthys.it
Wed Sep 22 08:28:42 UTC 2010
Gervase Markham wrote:
> No, it's definitely primarily about cataloguing and classifying licenses.
But not describing them in machine-readable way so that a tool can make a
license understandable by non-lawyer people :-)
>I'm on the mailing list and that is the focus of the discussion. So either
>the website is unclear on this point, or your first glance gave an
>incorrect impression :-)
Maybe these features are under discussion, but the current published version
of the specification (v1.0 beta; 07 August 2010) states simply how to
specify that a software package or component is released under a license.
This can be done putting an identifier of a license from a list of common
licenses or pointing to the text of a non standard license.
Am I wrong?
More information about the License-discuss