Question About CPL and EPL
forums at david-woolley.me.uk
Mon Sep 6 18:34:38 UTC 2010
David Dodini wrote:
> Does the deprecation of the CPL and it being superseded by the EPL
> indemnify us from adherence to terms of the CPL in favor of those of the
> EPL even in the the case of a library like wsdl4j which is distributed
> under the CPL?
No. It just means it shouldn't be used for new projects. The old
licence is still valid unless the code has been explicitly made
available under the new one.
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
More information about the License-discuss