Question About CPL and EPL

[David Woolley]

David Dodini wrote:

> Does the deprecation of the CPL and it being superseded by the EPL 
> indemnify us from adherence to terms of the CPL in favor of those of the 
> EPL even in the the case of a library like wsdl4j which is distributed 
> under the CPL?
> 

No.  It just means it shouldn't be used for new projects.  The old 
licence is still valid unless the code has been explicitly made 
available under the new one.

-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.