rms at 1407.org claiming "licenses aren't contracts" and that...

[Rick Moen]

Quoting Matthew Flaschen (matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu):

> This is ridiculous.  The list is not for general copyright law
> discussions, nor for general license discussions, nor for general
> contract discussions.  It exists so that licenses submitted to OSI can
> be discussed before approval.  There are obviously occasional
> discussions unrelated that topic, but they should be kept to a minimum.

Mr. Terekhov knows this, but finds the fact inconvenient.  See also:
http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/lexicon.html#tactical-stupidity