InfoWorld: Pentaho opens up further (Exhibit B to real MPL)

[Matthew Flaschen]

Brian Behlendorf wrote:
> I think the idea of a combinatorical set of license terms for Open
> Source is a good one, and should be pursued, but not piecemeal.  Instead
> it should be done as a set, like the Creative Commons did.  Might even
> be worth asking how much of CC's templates and modules could be re-used
> for such an effort.

The CC doesn't really have modules that is can just be combined freely.
   Every reasonable combo is pre-written as its own license.  Thus,
CC-BY-SA 2.5 is really
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/legalcode .

Everything else is essentially marketing.

Matthew Flaschen

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20070131/fb394d8a/attachment.sig>