Possibly...

[jubuntu 26]

I figured it was different enough from the BSD to be on there. Thanks for
the input.

On 25/07/06, Matthew Flaschen <superm40 at comcast.net> wrote:
>
> It probably "qualifies" in that it is compliant with the OSD
> (http://opensource.org/docs/definition.php).  However, I doubt it would
> ever be approved because it fulfills the exact same role as many other
> OSD-certified licenses, such as Fair License
> (http://opensource.org/licenses/fair.php) and the New BSD
> (http://opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php).
>
> Remember, though, you can not call it OSI-certified unless it is
> approved (upon which it will be added to the site).
>
> If you really want to seek approval for it, carefully follow the
> instructions at
> http://opensource.org/docs/certification_mark.php#approval and it will
> be considered.
>
> Matt Flaschen
>
> jubuntu 26 wrote:
> > Does http://ns.tan-com.com/nsfl.html qualify? It is BSD derived. (I just
> > realised the typo; it should be fixed soon.)
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.4/396 - Release Date:
> 7/24/2006
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20060726/d15a7b63/attachment.html>