I figured it was different enough from the BSD to be on there. Thanks for the input.<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 25/07/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Matthew Flaschen</b> <<a href="mailto:superm40@comcast.net">
superm40@comcast.net</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">It probably "qualifies" in that it is compliant with the OSD
<br>(<a href="http://opensource.org/docs/definition.php">http://opensource.org/docs/definition.php</a>).  However, I doubt it would<br>ever be approved because it fulfills the exact same role as many other<br>OSD-certified licenses, such as Fair License
<br>(<a href="http://opensource.org/licenses/fair.php">http://opensource.org/licenses/fair.php</a>) and the New BSD<br>(<a href="http://opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php">http://opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php
</a>).<br><br>Remember, though, you can not call it OSI-certified unless it is<br>approved (upon which it will be added to the site).<br><br>If you really want to seek approval for it, carefully follow the<br>instructions at
<br><a href="http://opensource.org/docs/certification_mark.php#approval">http://opensource.org/docs/certification_mark.php#approval</a> and it will<br>be considered.<br><br>Matt Flaschen<br><br>jubuntu 26 wrote:<br>> Does 
<a href="http://ns.tan-com.com/nsfl.html">http://ns.tan-com.com/nsfl.html</a> qualify? It is BSD derived. (I just<br>> realised the typo; it should be fixed soon.)<br>><br>><br>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
<br>><br>> No virus found in this incoming message.<br>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.<br>> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.4/396 - Release Date: 7/24/2006<br><br></blockquote></div><br>