Are these licenses are complete or correct?

Steve Mallett steve at
Mon Dec 2 13:11:41 UTC 2002

On Monday, December 2, 2002, at 11:59  AM, Yale Wu wrote:

> hi,
> 	I'm now trying to translate all the licenses proved by OSI and
> listed in into Chinese.
> 	I think it's a meaningful work because few people in China could
> understand these documents completely.
> 	But during my work, I found some licenses listed in 
> are not like themselves. For example, 
> and
>, the former seems losing 
> some parts,
> and latter seems having a redundant chunk of paragraph.
> 	And also there are some spelling mistakes, such as that->than...
> 	Could anyone to tell me why things are like that? Are these licenses 
> I mentioned
> above are really the same as they look like in
> 	If off topic of this maillist, forgive me. :)
> cheers
> Yale Wu

I'll take this off-list.  There do seem to be some errors....

Steve Mallett on the O'Reilly Network | steve at | webmaster at <personal>

Tax me, I'm Canadian!

license-discuss archive is at

More information about the License-discuss mailing list