[License-review] [License Review] Project Tick General Public License v1.0

[M.samet Duman]

Thank you for your honest feedback. It's accurate to say so.

I should have made it clear from the outset that the text under discussion was a draft and that a revised version was already planned for publication. It was my mistake not to state this from the beginning, and I understand how frustrating that can be in a review context.

The aim was not to waste reviewers' time, but to verify that the direction of the changes was consistent with the Open Source Definition before publication. However, I fully agree that the correct approach would have been to wait for the text to be finalized or to explicitly label it as a draft in the initial submission.

Nevertheless, thank you for your time and attention, and I will be more careful about timing and framing in future submissions.

Sincerely,
Mehmet Samet Duman
Author of Project Tick

> Kevin P. Fleming <lists.osi-license-review at kevin.km6g.us> şunları yazdı (21 Oca 2026 19:12):
> 
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2026, at 10:32, M.samet <http://m.samet/> Duman via License-review wrote:
>> I wanted to clarify that the license version you reviewed is an earlier draft. The revised Version 2 of the Project Tick General Public License will be released on February 2, 2026, and will explicitly address the concerns you raised.
> 
> Since you didn't mention this in your submission, you've now asked people in this group to review a license which you plan to replace in less than two weeks. This will not make you any friends in the review group, to say the least.
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20260121/e6992f9a/attachment.htm>