<html aria-label="message body"><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="overflow-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;"><div>Thank you for your honest feedback. It's accurate to say so.</div><div><br></div><div>I should have made it clear from the outset that the text under discussion was a draft and that a revised version was already planned for publication. It was my mistake not to state this from the beginning, and I understand how frustrating that can be in a review context.</div><div><br></div><div>The aim was not to waste reviewers' time, but to verify that the direction of the changes was consistent with the Open Source Definition before publication. However, I fully agree that the correct approach would have been to wait for the text to be finalized or to explicitly label it as a draft in the initial submission.</div><div><br></div><div>Nevertheless, thank you for your time and attention, and I will be more careful about timing and framing in future submissions.</div><div><br></div><div>Sincerely,</div><div>Mehmet Samet Duman</div><div>Author of Project Tick</div><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div>Kevin P. Fleming <lists.osi-license-review@kevin.km6g.us> \u015funlar\u0131 yazd\u0131 (21 Oca 2026 19:12):</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div><title></title><div><div>On Wed, Jan 21, 2026, at 10:32, <a href="http://m.samet/">M.samet</a> Duman via License-review wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite" id="qt" style="overflow-wrap:break-word;"><div>I wanted to clarify that the license version you reviewed is an earlier draft. The revised Version 2 of the Project Tick General Public License will be released on February 2, 2026, and will explicitly address the concerns you raised.</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Since you didn't mention this in your submission, you've now asked people in this group to review a license which you plan to replace in less than two weeks. This will not make you any friends in the review group, to say the least.</div><div><br></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></body></html>