[License-review] CDDL 1.1

[Warner, Brian (TS3K)]

Thanks Pam and Josh, I can do that. I saw Richard's suggestion that it might be most appropriate as a legacy license, I'll submit using that process.

Brian


________________________________________
From: License-review <license-review-bounces at lists.opensource.org> on behalf of Pamela Chestek <pamela.chestek at opensource.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2024 8:22 AM
To: Josh Berkus <josh at berkus.org>; License submissions for OSI review <license-review at lists.opensource.org>
Subject: Re: [License-review] CDDL 1.1

Then someone needs to formally submit it for review.

Pam

Pamela S. Chestek
Chair, Licensing Committee
Open Source Initiative

On 9/9/2024 7:02 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 7/24/24 23:10, Pamela Chestek wrote:
>>
>> Why do you ask? Do you have a current need for the license to be
>> approved?
>
> Based on some license scanning I've done of Java projects, CDDL 1.1 is
> pretty widely adopted within some sets of still-popular Java
> libraries. In general, those libraries released with CDDL 1.0 seem to
> have mostly updated to 1.1.  So I'd like to see us rule on the update.
>
> One of the attorneys needs to weigh in, though, I can't make heads or
> tails of the new patent provision.
>