[License-review] CDDL 1.1

[Pamela Chestek]

Then someone needs to formally submit it for review.

Pam

Pamela S. Chestek
Chair, Licensing Committee
Open Source Initiative

On 9/9/2024 7:02 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 7/24/24 23:10, Pamela Chestek wrote:
>>
>> Why do you ask? Do you have a current need for the license to be 
>> approved?
>
> Based on some license scanning I've done of Java projects, CDDL 1.1 is 
> pretty widely adopted within some sets of still-popular Java 
> libraries. In general, those libraries released with CDDL 1.0 seem to 
> have mostly updated to 1.1.  So I'd like to see us rule on the update.
>
> One of the attorneys needs to weigh in, though, I can't make heads or 
> tails of the new patent provision.
>