[License-review] For Approval: Open Logistics License v1.3 (was v1.2)

Andreas Nettsträter andreas.nettstraeter at openlogisticsfoundation.org
Mon Jan 30 07:37:27 UTC 2023


At least, this seems to be one factor for some of them.

Regards
Andreas

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Josh Berkus <josh at berkus.org> 
Gesendet: Freitag, 27. Januar 2023 19:02
An: License submissions for OSI review <license-review at lists.opensource.org>; Andreas Nettsträter <andreas.nettstraeter at openlogisticsfoundation.org>
Betreff: Re: [License-review] For Approval: Open Logistics License v1.3 (was v1.2)

On 1/27/23 02:51, Andreas Nettsträter wrote:
> Here, it helps enormously if a licence can be used that meets all the criteria of open source and at the same time is compatible with one's own legal area. Many of the lawyers involved have noticed that there are paragraphs in established licences that are not permitted in Germany (and other parts of Europe) (such as complete exclusion of liability). We do not want to judge whether this is more a theoretical or a really practical problem. However, the companies themselves have now the option to decide and to choose.

Thanks.  So you're saying that some European companies have been reluctant to put work under an OSS license because of this specific issue?

--
Josh Berkus



More information about the License-review mailing list