[License-review] Approval: Blue Oak Model License 1.0.0
pamela.chestek at opensource.org
Mon May 16 13:38:22 UTC 2022
Dear Mr. Rawes,
Since you have not responded to this email pointing out that further
information is require for a license submission, we will assume that you
have lost interest in having the license considered. In that case, the
OSI will consider it withdrawn. If that is not your intention, please
respond to this email with the missing information.
Chair, License Committee
Open Source Initiative
On 3/20/2022 10:45 PM, McCoy Smith wrote:
> You've only included a copy of the license text, but have not completed the other questions that you're supposed to complete when submitting a license for approval, which can be found here:
> Rationale: Clearly state rationale for a new license
> Distinguish: Compare to and contrast with the most similar OSI-approved license(s)
> Legal review: Describe any legal review the license has been through, and provide results of any legal analysis if available
> Proliferation category: Recommend which license proliferation category is appropriate
> [FWIW, I think the Legal Review has been done already by the Blue Oak Council, which is composed of 3 lawyers, Kyle Mitchell, Heather Meeker & Luis Villa. Are you submitting on behalf of them?]
> I think any review of this license should be suspended at least until those questions are answered.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: License-review <license-review-bounces at lists.opensource.org> On
>> Behalf Of MrRawes via License-review
>> Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2022 2:17 PM
>> To: license-review at lists.opensource.org
>> Cc: MrRawes <MrRawes at protonmail.com>
>> Subject: [License-review] Approval: Blue Oak Model License 1.0.0
>> Approval request for "Blue Oak Model License 1.0.0"
> The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Communication from the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.
> License-review mailing list
> License-review at lists.opensource.org
More information about the License-review