[License-review] Final comment on Open Logistics License (was Re: For Approval: Open Logistics License v1.2)

[Jason Self]

On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 09:23:16 -0800
Pamela Chestek <pamela.chestek at opensource.org> wrote:

> Yes, I wasn't clear. I was saying that the license review process
> does not take a vote among participants on the license-review list,
> nor does anyone on the license-review list have any authority to
> direct the Board's vote (including me), nor does anyone have sway
> with the Board beyond their ability to make cogent argument for or
> against approval. I thought it was worth mentioning in this case
> because I had received feedback in the past that the role of the
> license-review list is confusing and the authoritarian way Bradley
> stated his disagreement.

I see. Thank you. I guess we're reading the same message differently.
I didn't see it as authoritarian; but a request. I assume that
whether and to what extent the Board may consider other items, such
statements from the mailing list archives, and not solely and
exclusively rely on the rationale document prepared by the license
committee when reaching a decision, is at the Board's discretion.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20221214/76010cac/attachment.sig>