[License-review] Approval submission for the Qlovatech License

Russell Nelson nelson at crynwr.com
Mon Feb 22 14:00:13 UTC 2021

On 2/13/21 9:52 PM, Roland Turner via License-review wrote:
> the more work *every single open source project* selecting amongst OSI 
> approved licenses has to undertake in selecting an appropriate license;

Nahhhh. If you're writing code in a context, use the same license 
everybody else in that context uses, e.g. Python or Perl or BSD or 
Microsoft. If not, choose between Apache and GPL. Done.

Or Microsoft public and Microsoft reciprocal. I understand the 
complicated relationship between Microsoft and the Open Source community 
(e.g. the latest Visual Open Studio && Raspberry Pi OS kerfuffle), but 
really, the two Microsoft licenses cover 99% of what we need from a license.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20210222/08917c2c/attachment.html>

More information about the License-review mailing list