[License-review] Approval submission for the Qlovatech License
nelson at crynwr.com
Mon Feb 22 14:00:13 UTC 2021
On 2/13/21 9:52 PM, Roland Turner via License-review wrote:
> the more work *every single open source project* selecting amongst OSI
> approved licenses has to undertake in selecting an appropriate license;
Nahhhh. If you're writing code in a context, use the same license
everybody else in that context uses, e.g. Python or Perl or BSD or
Microsoft. If not, choose between Apache and GPL. Done.
Or Microsoft public and Microsoft reciprocal. I understand the
complicated relationship between Microsoft and the Open Source community
(e.g. the latest Visual Open Studio && Raspberry Pi OS kerfuffle), but
really, the two Microsoft licenses cover 99% of what we need from a license.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the License-review