[License-review] Request - For Approval - Ritchey Permissive License v11

[Eric Schultz]

>
>
> There's the much more substantial issue of "What if the lincensor cannot
> use courts in BC at all."  For example, what if the potential licensor
> lives in a country that Canada has embargoed.  It has been the policy of
> this body that licenses that can be violated by a national embargo are
> not open-source, because they violate OSD5.
>

While I think this is a good principle and strongly support it, it is
important to note that a previous version (and possibly latest, I haven't
checked) of the Eclipse Public License requires NY State as its choice of
jurisdiction.

Eric

>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20210216/fdbeae25/attachment.html>