[License-review] veto against Unlicense
Thorsten Glaser
tg at mirbsd.de
Tue Jun 2 22:08:19 UTC 2020
Josh Berkus dixit:
>have said they'd still recommend against it even if they thought it was
>technically open source.
No, they sais they’d still recommend against it even if OSI were to
approve it. Quite the distinction, it’s a vote against approval in
my interpretation.
bye,
//mirabilos, somewhat fed up with earlier licence discussions today,
not meaning to be rude or anything, if this comes over as;
I don’t suppose you have anything on synthesiser output being
derivative works of not only the scores (e.g. MIDIs) but also
of the soundfont(s)/samples used, which I could use to beat
some sense into people not even wanting to honour the *one*
requirement of the MIT licence… sorry, that’s offtopic…
--
15:41⎜<Lo-lan-do:#fusionforge> Somebody write a testsuite for helloworld :-)
More information about the License-review
mailing list