[License-review] veto against Unlicense

Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd.de
Tue Jun 2 22:08:19 UTC 2020

Josh Berkus dixit:

>have said they'd still recommend against it even if they thought it was
>technically open source.

No, they sais they’d still recommend against it even if OSI were to
approve it. Quite the distinction, it’s a vote against approval in
my interpretation.

//mirabilos, somewhat fed up with earlier licence discussions today,
	not meaning to be rude or anything, if this comes over as;
	I don’t suppose you have anything on synthesiser output being
	derivative works of not only the scores (e.g. MIDIs) but also
	of the soundfont(s)/samples used, which I could use to beat
	some sense into people not even wanting to honour the *one*
	requirement of the MIT licence… sorry, that’s offtopic…
15:41⎜<Lo-lan-do:#fusionforge> Somebody write a testsuite for helloworld :-)

More information about the License-review mailing list