[License-review] For Approval: Convertible Free Software License, Version 1.3 (C-FSL v1.3)
nigel.2048 at gmail.com
Fri Jan 11 20:00:52 UTC 2019
5.1.f is a deal killer for me...
Essentially it means that every fork must exist in a public repo and it is
trivially easy to not be in compliance. For example I be working on
something, do a local commit, get busy for a month without doing a push and
boom, I’m out of compliance.
That said I don’t think it fails freedom 0 because of 5.1.f other than
being really easy to be out of compliance.
In the interest of disclosure I am the (junior) author of the Upstream
Compatibility License…there was a discussion of asymmetry at the time of
approval. UCL derivative works are dual licensed as Apache and UCL. UCL
itself is just OSL with a one line change in 1C.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:11 PM Smith, McCoy <mccoy.smith at intel.com> wrote:
> *>>From:* License-review [mailto:
> license-review-bounces at lists.opensource.org] *On Behalf Of *Carlo Piana
> >># THERE IS MORE!
> >>Under Section 5.1
> >>f) You must make available to the public any Derivative Work or changes to the Work within one month from their creation.
> >>This creates another huge asymmetry.
> >>Under copyright law, I can decide whether or not to publish the code i
> contribute. Under the proposed license, it is required that this right is
> waived as a condition to use the copyright. I think this is unprecedented.
> I might be making changes that I don't want to release to the public
> neither in object code, because they are buggy, because I don't want to
> take responsibility if anybody uses them. In this case, if I fork the
> project I have NO WAY TO AVOID PROVIDING IT UPSTREAM.
> Hence the value of Freedom Zero of the FSD. I continue to think that that
> concept is inherent in the OSD (in particular OSD 9), and not having it be
> a part of the OSD results in rather bizarre theoretical results, which I
> outlined here:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the License-review