[License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 2)

[VanL]

On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 2:57 PM Pamela Chestek <pamela at chesteklegal.com>
wrote:

> We have been here before. If I understand correctly, your argument is that
> one must be allowed you to run the software *with the same data*, and
> therefore it is an open source license because it enforces that condition.
> Assuming I have understood it correctly, you have answered my question.
>

Very close. You must be allowed to run the software with *your own data*.
Phrasing it as "the same data" brings into scope other people's data, and
the operator's data, which are not included unless they are somehow
intrinsically necessary to the functioning of the software as delivered to
you.

Thanks,
Van
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20190823/b7a0b447/attachment.html>