[License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 2)

[Bruce Perens]

On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 10:50 AM Pamela Chestek <pamela at chesteklegal.com>
wrote:

> The licenses that mention a trademark only say that it's not a trademark
> license grant, or that the grant is only insofar as needed to comply with
> the license.


The last sentence of OSD #4  is specific to trademark and branding.

I don't see how data fits that model, or at least how it does in this
> license.


Since it is proposed that I can not practically run the program without the
data, and it must be presented to me by the licensee, do I also have a
right to be provided with a hardware platform upon which to execute the
program? The point is that the OSD can not and does not guarantee that a
particular user can actually run the program. It just tries to keep certain
legal impediments out of their way.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20190823/a1a14ab0/attachment-0001.html>