[License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 2)

[VanL]

On Fri, Aug 23, 2019, 11:01 AM Kevin P. Fleming <kevin+osi at km6g.us> wrote:

>
> Extending the hypothetical based on common usage: such a widget would
> almost certainly send JavaScript code to the client which would then
> reach out to Twitter in order to obtain the desired content, rather
> than obtaining the content on the server side. Because of this, the
> user of the widget needs to both know whether it qualifies as
> *modified* and also how it actually operates (whether there is any
> code or active content delivered to the user) in order to properly
> assess their compliance burden under any network-copyleft license.
>

Kevin is correct as to how such a widget could work. But I would think that
the work would almost always be modified in some respect - at least to
specify which Twitter feed to fetch.

Thanks,
Van

>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20190823/59526e5b/attachment.html>