[License-review] Please rename "Free Public License-1.0.0" to 0BSD.

[Nigel T]

My assumption is that if the list is split after recommend 60 days that the
board will vote on it anyway?  I would be surprised if there was anything
new to discuss or uncover by mid-November even if the list isn't
quiescent.... Not trying to be a pest about timeliness but this is a
relatively minor issue...and sufficiently rare that I don't think we need a
new process to govern naming.  Creating a new process seems like a long and
tedious can of worms not worth opening.

I guess you can put me in the process minimalist camp. :)

On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 6:16 PM Simon Phipps <webmink at opensource.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 12:11 AM Nigel T <nigel.2048 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The "procedure" should be that the board votes on it.
>>
>
> Per normal list procedure, the Board will vote on it when consensus
> emerges and the discussion quiesces.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Simon
>
> --
> Simon Phipps*, President, The Open Source Initiative*
> www.opensource.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> License-review mailing list
> License-review at lists.opensource.org
>
> http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20181019/09c4d5fe/attachment-0001.html>