[License-review] Please rename "Free Public License-1.0.0" to 0BSD.

[Rick Moen]

Quoting Nigel T (nigel.2048 at gmail.com):

> I don't see that this is misleading in any substantive way.  ISC is
> functionally equivalent to BSD and OpenBSD is using ISC.  I don't see the
> linkage with OpenBSD to be tenuous at all.  If OpenBSD submitted it as an
> ISC derivative would it make it less "misleading"?

I tend to agree, FWIW.  Also, two-clause BSD appears to me to only barely
differ from ISC in the first place, the former having slightly different
conditions about copyright notice & license display, and a slightly more
elaborate warranty disclaimer.

And I do think Marshall Kirk McKusick's blessing counts.

-- 
Cheers,                              "When do you see yourself in five years?"
Rick Moen                            - time traveler interview
rick at linuxmafia.com                             -- Matt Watson (@biorhythmist)
McQ! (4x80)