[License-review] moving to an issue tracker [was Re: Some notes for license submitters]

[Brendan Hickey]

+1, nothing to add but my emphatic agreement.

On Tue, Jun 19, 2018, 1:48 PM Josh berkus <josh at postgresql.org> wrote:

> On 06/19/2018 10:29 AM, Luis Villa wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 7:57 AM Josh berkus <josh at postgresql.org
> >     For my part, I think even moving to a bugzilla instance would be an
> >     improvement over the current workflow, but apparently I don't have
> >     consensus on that.
> >
> >
> > Any particular reason not to move to GitLab? Seems like an issue tracker
> > there (maybe a new project per license, maybe not?) might be pretty easy
> > to set up and get running.
> >
> > (Or, frankly, GitHub, since OSI has already bitten the bullet and hosted
> > projects there.)
>
> WFM.  Just an issue tracker, really.
>
> Something that allows per-line comments would be delightful, actually,
> so GitLab/GitHub would be great.
>
> We'd only need one project, but we'd put the list of licenses in
> directories and license submitters can send in PRs.  This will then
> permit us to do a "code review" of the licenses.
>
> --Josh
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> License-review mailing list
> License-review at lists.opensource.org
>
> http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20180619/fd416bcf/attachment.html>