[License-review] Submission of the Upstream Compatibility License v1.0 (UCL-1.0) for approval

Simon Phipps simon at webmink.com
Tue Oct 25 16:52:05 UTC 2016


On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Nigel T <nigel.2048 at gmail.com> wrote:

> My opinion is that the OSI should be more inclusive of differing opinions
> within the FOSS community.  That includes licenses that are more friendly
> for commercial entities to maintain a business model that supports both
> open and closed source.


Given OSI's role is to promote open source rather than to support its
subversion by facilitating proprietary behaviour, that seems an
unreasonable opinion.

S.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20161025/5ae93712/attachment.html>


More information about the License-review mailing list