[License-review] exploring tracking tool for license-review

[Allison Randal]

On 05/13/2016 06:37 PM, Josh berkus wrote:
> On 05/13/2016 02:40 PM, Allison Randal wrote:
>> So, with that level of detail, and in the interest of keeping the
>> headers on the Kanban board readable, I'd modify your list more like like:
>>
>> OPEN - NEW
>> OPEN - UNDER DISCUSSION
>> OPEN - CHANGES REQUESTED
>> OPEN - AWAITING VOTE
>>
>> CLOSED - ACCEPTED
>> CLOSED - REJECTED
>>
>> CLOSED+ARCHIVED - INVALID
>> CLOSED+ARCHIVED - WITHDRAWN
> 
> This still seems like too many headers and words for a kanban board.

The OPEN, CLOSED, ARCHIVED part doesn't appear in the header on the
kanban board, it's just an attribute of the status that appears on the
details page.

> My suggestion:
> 
> NEW
> DISCUSSION
> CHANGES REQUESTED
> PENDING VOTE

I like these simplifications.

> And 3 Closed/Archive statuses:
> 
> ARCHIVE: ACCEPTED
> ARCHIVE: REJECTED  #would include invalid
> ARCHIVE: WITHDRAWN

On the kanban board, these appear as just:

ACCEPTED
REJECTED
WITHDRAWN

Allison