[License-review] [Bulk] Re: Request for Approval : Modular Open-source Software License (MOSL)

[Bruce Perens]

On 09/25/2012 12:59 PM, Hadrien Grasland wrote:
>
> Pretty much, but not quite. For derivative works, I also want that 
> additional licensing terms on derivative works do not alter the 
> meaning of the original terms. This is why I think that the "provided 
> that the following conditions are met" formulation from the Sleepycat 
> license is so interesting : it seems to guarantee exactly this.
This depends on "must be freely redistributable under reasonable 
conditions", which you indicated your intent to remove. That's the only 
part that controls the license conditions of derivative works.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20120925/8be9c7d3/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bruce.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 266 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20120925/8be9c7d3/attachment.vcf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4460 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20120925/8be9c7d3/attachment.p7s>