[License-review] Svoboda for Approval

[Gregor Pintar]

Clark C. Evans <cce at clarkevans.com> pointed me out license is not
enought explicit and that it only hurts license proliferation.

I think license doesn't only hurt proliferation, because there is no
OSI approved license that would allow removing all copyright and other notices.

More explicit license text:
"This work is provided 'as-is', without any express or implied warranty,
to the utmost extent permitted by applicable law. In no event shall the
authors be held liable for any damages arising from this work.

Permission is granted to anyone to:
 - use, copy, modify, distribute this work for any purpose with or without fee.
 - modify or remove this notices and authors.

authors name <authors contact>"

I hope this is better.
It is composed from parts of well known licenses like ISC, MirOS and zlib.

Thanks,
Gregor Pintar

2012/5/20, Gregor Pintar <grpintar at gmail.com>:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to submit my license for approval. It is very short and
> simple. It can be applied to any work. It is similar to WTFPL,
> but it has nicer words. This license tries to do the same as
> releasing into the public domain, but public domain varies
> with the jurisdictions.
>
> Name: Svoboda (in Slavic languages meaning "freedom")
> Category: "Other/Miscellaneous licenses"
> License text:
> "You can do anything you want with this work, but it comes
> without any warranty, to the extent permitted by applicable law.
>
> authors name <authors contact>"
>
>
> Any suggestions and improvements are wecome.
>
> Thanks,
> Gregor Pintar
>