[License-review] Submitting MPL for Approval

Bruce Perens bruce at perens.com
Fri Dec 9 04:00:16 UTC 2011

Sigh. This makes it all too easy for people to make derived versions of 
the license, and thus it drives license proliferation. This is not 
grounds for rejection of the license.

A lot of the 69 licenses currently on the approved list are derivative 
of older Mozilla text.


On 12/08/2011 07:48 PM, Karl Fogel wrote:
> 10.3. Modified Versions
> >
> >If you create software not governed by this License, and you want to
> >create a new license for such software, you may create and use a
> >modified version of this License if you rename the license and remove
> >any references to the name of the license steward (except to note that
> >such modified license differs from this License).

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bruce.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 266 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20111208/02c4c072/attachment.vcf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4447 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20111208/02c4c072/attachment.p7s>

More information about the License-review mailing list