For Approval By: S-GPL

[zhihang wang]

Yes. Perhaps I understand the problem.
The second license of QT license, "a standard proprietary license.", should
not discussed here.
So I can use my license on my project. But it is not a new open source
license.
The main difference part from the QT license is not a open source license.


2009/5/29 Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des at des.no>

> zhihang wang <zhihang.wang at gmail.com> writes:
> > But it is dual license.
>
> There are two entirely separate licenses.  One is the GPL, the other is
> a standard proprietary license.  There is no two-faced "Qt license" to
> measure your license up against.
>
> DES
> --
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des at des.no
>



-- 
Best Regards
zhihang wang