?sthetic Permissive License - For Approval

Sean B. Palmer sean at miscoranda.com
Sat Dec 29 21:19:16 UTC 2007

On Dec 29, 2007 8:22 PM, Lawrence Rosen <lrosen at rosenlaw.com> wrote:

> As to my own licenses, OSL/AFL 3.0, that two-line form of notice
> is expressly the minimum required.

But neither are DFSG compatible. I didn't mention that requirement.

Next week on license-review! SBP wants the moon!

> John often teases us with such ancient runes from the days when
> the web was slow and warriors fought.

Whilst this is true, it was me who first mentioned the McQuary limit,
in my initial submission. Ironically it's quite possible that John
Cowan taught me about the limit years ago.

(My records however indicate Terje Bless as the most likely candidate.)

Any DFSG compatible suggestions? Not that I am owed them, for I am
already indebted on the suggestions front.

Sean B. Palmer, http://inamidst.com/sbp/

More information about the License-review mailing list