[License-discuss] Curious about derived works and AI...

[Bruce Perens]

1. Not in Japan, because they've decided to make their law that way. 2. It
should be the case in most countries, but it is not so far because it's not
literal copying and cases which are attempting to make the point that it is
copying are still in litigation.

On Sat, May 25, 2024, 06:55 Miles Georgi <azimux at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi! If I open-source a project with a free license, if code from that
> project winds up being used as training data or prompt data to a
> code-generating AI to generate similar code, would that generated code be
> considered a derived work under any circumstances? And does that
> potentially depend on what license is chosen?
>
> I'm trying to choose a license for a project I wish to release and I'm
> assuming there's no way to protect against something like that but figured
> I'd ask.
>
> Cheers!
>
> Miles
> _______________________________________________
> The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not
> necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the
> Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.
>
> License-discuss mailing list
> License-discuss at lists.opensource.org
>
> http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20240525/9c80c477/attachment.html>