[License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD?

Simon Phipps simon at webmink.net
Mon Sep 19 21:50:24 UTC 2022


The Neo4J case, not one involving Linagora (yet) - they are just the
company behind Linshare.

Oh, I realise I said Linaro earlier - sorry! I meant Linagora.

S.
(in a personal capacity)

On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 10:25 PM McCoy Smith <mccoy at lexpan.law> wrote:

> OK I’ll bite: which case are you referring to?
> I’m not seeing anything from Linaro on PACER.
>
>
>
> *From:* License-discuss <license-discuss-bounces at lists.opensource.org> *On
> Behalf Of *Simon Phipps
> *Sent:* Monday, September 19, 2022 1:24 PM
> *To:* license-discuss at lists.opensource.org
> *Subject:* Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice
> violate OSD?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 9:21 PM Stefano Zacchiroli <zack at opensource.org>
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 11:41:06AM -0700, McCoy Smith wrote:
> > Seems like it might violate the definition of appropriate legal notice
> in GPLv3.
>
> ... hence, one should be able to just remove these de facto "further
> restrictions", as per:
>
>   > All other non-permissive additional terms are considered "further
>   > restrictions" within the meaning of section 10. If the Program as
>   > you received it, or any part of it, contains a notice stating that
>   > it is governed by this License along with a term that is a further
>   > restriction, you may remove that term.
>
> Right?
>
>
>
> A recent court case in the US suggests that if Linaro owns all the
> copyrights it would be unwise to rely on that without further precedent or
> reliable defence.
>
>
>
> Simon
>
> (in a personal capacity)
> _______________________________________________
> The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not
> necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the
> Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.
>
> License-discuss mailing list
> License-discuss at lists.opensource.org
>
> http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20220919/52032fe7/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the License-discuss mailing list