[License-discuss] CPAL 1.0 License | Badge-ware | Clarification

[Henrik Ingo]

Hi Syed

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 4:41 PM Syed Arsalan Hussain Shah <
arsalan at buddyexpress.net> wrote:

> [1][2] Does the CPAL 1.0 considered badgeware license?
>
>
Yes, it is the other license that has a similar attribution clause as AAL.
Although it was approved by OSI in the past, there have been some
suggestions that it too should be removed from the list of approved
licenses. Probably AAL and CPAL would be removed together, or neither
would. (Note that so far all of this is just discussion. There is currently
no formal process to remove any license.)


> Name |  Common Public Attribution License Version 1.0 (CPAL-1.0)
> OSI | APPROVED
> FSF | APPROVED
>
>
The fact that FSF also recognizes CPAL as a free software license is an
interesting addition to this argument.

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html

henrik
-- 
henrik.ingo at avoinelama.fi
+358-40-5697354        skype: henrik.ingo            irc: hingo
www.openlife.cc

My LinkedIn profile: http://fi.linkedin.com/pub/henrik-ingo/3/232/8a7
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20200331/64b114d9/attachment.html>