[License-discuss] FYI, opensource.dev released

[Tzeng, Nigel H.]

As an Eclipse user I don't really care if there are any other projects...it's a large ecosystem by itself and there is strong community support for it.

And cathedral is every bit as valid a development style as bazaar for open source.

Nigel

On 1/10/19, 10:27 AM, "License-discuss on behalf of Thorsten Glaser" <license-discuss-bounces at lists.opensource.org on behalf of tg at mirbsd.de> wrote:

    Mike Milinkovich dixit:
    
    > On 2019-01-09 5:16 p.m., John Cowan wrote:
    
    >> Foundation.B  Wikipedia lists only four beyond the four you mentioned: ksh,
    >> graphviz, Jikes, and UWIN.
    
    And ksh and UWIN come from (well originally, ksh93 was forked)
    the same source tree.
    
    > But until or unless the OSI changes its criteria, I will continue to assert
    > that the EPL is supported by a strong community.
    
    No.
    
    The EPL is supported by a strong foundation (centralised)
    but has virtually no support from the community (bazaar,
    individual non-Eclipse-affiliated developers using it).
    
    bye,
    //mirabilos
    -- 
    “The final straw, to be honest, was probably my amazement at the volume of
    petty, peevish whingeing certain of your peers are prone to dish out on
    d-devel, telling each other how to talk more like a pretty princess, as though
    they were performing some kind of public service.” (someone to me, privately)
    
    _______________________________________________
    License-discuss mailing list
    License-discuss at lists.opensource.org
    http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org