[License-discuss] Discussion: AGPL and Open Source Definition conflict

Richard Fontana rfontana at redhat.com
Wed Aug 14 16:01:42 UTC 2019

On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 11:51 AM Smith, McCoy <mccoy.smith at intel.com> wrote:

> Interestingly, I didn’t see AGPLv3 in any of the License Committee reports of that era.  And I couldn’t see, through the Wayback Machine, that AGPLv1 ever got on the OSI list (although I haven’t done a comprehensive search of those archives).

If I'm not mistaken, AGPLv1 was never formally submitted for OSI approval.

I remember finding in the license-discuss archives a posting from
sometime in the early/mid-2000s asking about the open source status of
AGPLv1. If I can find it again I will post a link to it here.


More information about the License-discuss mailing list