[License-discuss] Question about LGPL 2.1 and APL 2.0 Compatibility
bryan.christ at gmail.com
Thu Apr 25 18:03:02 UTC 2019
I am the author of a library that is licensed under the LGPL 2.1. It's
very clear that a closed source work can dynamically link to the library.
That's easy to understand. There are 2 other scenarios however that I am
1. Can a LGPL 2.1 dynamically link to an APL 2.0 library or binary?
2. Can an APL 2.0 binary dynamically link to a LGPL 2.1 library?
I did a lot of searching on the web first and couldn't find anything
Thanks in advance to whoever replies.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the License-discuss