[License-discuss] Mixed 5yr non-open then fully open license

[Thorsten Glaser]

John Dupuy dixit:

> Is this the best way to word it?

It looks good to me, but IANAL either.

> Does the URL work, or should I insert the MIT license itself?

The MIT licence itself requires others who distribute the work to
include a copy of the licence, so, to easen their job, you really
should include the full licence body with the work.

> That is nice and simple and clean. I'll perhaps call it "Timed-MIT"
> when corresponding with others.

Sounds fine to me. Just make sure they understand it’s not a new
licence but a timed grant.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
I believe no one can invent an algorithm. One just happens to hit upon it
when God enlightens him. Or only God invents algorithms, we merely copy them.
If you don't believe in God, just consider God as Nature if you won't deny
existence.		-- Coywolf Qi Hunt