[License-discuss] Mixed 5yr non-open then fully open license

[John Dupuy]

So, to nail it down, possibly:

"""
TIMED GRANT TO MIT LICENSE

Copyright (c) 2017, John Dupuy

For all works and assets in this repository, all rights reserved except 
as granted.

On July 4, 2023, the MIT open source license is fully granted on the 
works and assets.

MIT license reference: https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
"""

Is this the best way to word it? Does the URL work, or should I insert 
the MIT license itself? I'm not a lawyer, so I have no idea if URLs are 
frowned upon :).

That is nice and simple and clean. I'll perhaps call it "Timed-MIT" when 
corresponding with others.


John
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20180731/ba3a3f14/attachment.html>