[License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1

[Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: License-discuss [mailto:license-discuss-bounces at opensource.org] On 
> Behalf Of John Cowan
> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 10:05 AM
> To: license-discuss at opensource.org
> Subject: Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative 
> was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL
> OSL) Version 0.4.1
>
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) 
> <cem.f.karan.civ at mail.mil < Caution-
> mailto:cem.f.karan.civ at mail.mil > > wrote:
>
>
> 	OK, thank you, I'll contact them and see what they think.
>
>
> Note that the DFSG #1-#9 are verbatim the same as OSD #1-#9, but the 
> interpretations may differ.  (#10 is separate and unrelated in the
> two definitions.)  Note also that debian-legal does not control what 
> actually gets into Debian; that decision is in the hands of the trusted
> committers.
>
> --
> John Cowan          Caution-http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan < 
> Caution-http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan >         cowan at ccil.org < Caution-
> mailto:cowan at ccil.org >

I understand, and appreciate the concern.  I'm not worried about Debian 
including ARL code; I'm concerned about Debian being precluded from including 
code because of actions on ARL's part.  Basically, I want to make sure they 
have the option of using ARL code; we have to earn the privilege to be 
included in there. :)

Thanks,
Cem Karan

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6419 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20170320/3206c267/attachment.p7s>