[License-discuss] Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1

Richard Fontana fontana at sharpeleven.org
Wed Mar 1 14:49:15 UTC 2017

On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:37:13AM -0500, Richard Fontana wrote:
> Strictly speaking, the use of
> CC0 assumes that you have copyright ownership. 

I guess that's a bit of an overstatement, but still given the nature
of the angst I've heard from US government people over the years
concerning the use of nominal copyright licenses, I'd find it
surprising if CC0 was treated differently.

More information about the License-discuss mailing list